On 8/29/22 13:46, Ricky Zhou wrote:
Thanks for taking a look at this - did you see the bit in the cover
letter where I discuss doing this via alignment requirements on the
memory operation? My logic was that the memop alignment checks seem to
be more oriented towards triggering #AC exceptions (ev
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 9:45 AM Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> On 8/29/22 07:23, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> This trap should be raised via the memory operation:
> ...
> Only the first of the two loads/stores must be aligned, as the other is known
> to be +8.
> You then must fill in the x86_tcg_ops.do_unal
On 8/29/22 07:23, Ricky Zhou wrote:
Many instructions which load/store 128-bit values are supposed to
raise #GP when the memory operand isn't 16-byte aligned. This includes:
- Instructions explicitly requiring memory alignment (Exceptions Type 1
in the "AVX and SSE Instruction Exception Spe
Many instructions which load/store 128-bit values are supposed to
raise #GP when the memory operand isn't 16-byte aligned. This includes:
- Instructions explicitly requiring memory alignment (Exceptions Type 1
in the "AVX and SSE Instruction Exception Specification" section of
the SDM)
- Le
