Fiona Ebner writes:
> Am 26.03.24 um 10:06 schrieb Markus Armbruster:
>>> @@ -365,7 +368,13 @@ BlockCopyState *block_copy_state_new(BdrvChild
>>> *source, BdrvChild *target,
>>>
>>> GLOBAL_STATE_CODE();
>>>
>>> -cluster_size = block_copy_calculate_cluster_size(target->bs, errp);
Am 26.03.24 um 10:06 schrieb Markus Armbruster:
>> @@ -365,7 +368,13 @@ BlockCopyState *block_copy_state_new(BdrvChild *source,
>> BdrvChild *target,
>>
>> GLOBAL_STATE_CODE();
>>
>> -cluster_size = block_copy_calculate_cluster_size(target->bs, errp);
>> +if (min_cluster_size &&
On 08.03.24 18:51, Fiona Ebner wrote:
Useful to make discard-source work in the context of backup fleecing
when the fleecing image has a larger granularity than the backup
target.
Copy-before-write operations will use at least this granularity and in
particular, discard requests to the source
Fiona Ebner writes:
> Useful to make discard-source work in the context of backup fleecing
> when the fleecing image has a larger granularity than the backup
> target.
>
> Copy-before-write operations will use at least this granularity and in
> particular, discard requests to the source node
Useful to make discard-source work in the context of backup fleecing
when the fleecing image has a larger granularity than the backup
target.
Copy-before-write operations will use at least this granularity and in
particular, discard requests to the source node will too. If the
granularity is too
