On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 10:13:30AM +0200, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> On 6/1/21 8:48 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > +Vitaly
> >
> > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 11:13:12AM +0200, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> >> we need to expand features first, before we attempt to check them
> >> in the accel realizefn code
Eduardo Habkost writes:
>>
>> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
>> index 9e211ac2ce..6bcb7dbc2c 100644
>> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
>> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
>> @@ -6133,34 +6133,6 @@ static void x86_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error
>> **errp)
>> Error *local_err =
On 6/1/21 8:48 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> +Vitaly
>
> On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 11:13:12AM +0200, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> we need to expand features first, before we attempt to check them
>> in the accel realizefn code called by cpu_exec_realizefn().
>>
>> At the same time we need checks for
+Vitaly
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 11:13:12AM +0200, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> we need to expand features first, before we attempt to check them
> in the accel realizefn code called by cpu_exec_realizefn().
>
> At the same time we need checks for code_urev and host_cpuid_required,
> and
we need to expand features first, before we attempt to check them
in the accel realizefn code called by cpu_exec_realizefn().
At the same time we need checks for code_urev and host_cpuid_required,
and modifications to cpu->mwait to happen after the initial setting
of them inside the accel
