Re: [PATCH 1/2] pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio: Set missing status bits while initializing

2022-06-23 Thread Eric Farman
On Thu, 2022-06-23 at 09:11 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > According chapter "3.1.1 Driver Requirements: Device Initialization" > of the Virtio specification (v1.1), a driver for a device has to set > the ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits in the status field after resetting > the device. The s390-ccw bios

Re: [PATCH 1/2] pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio: Set missing status bits while initializing

2022-06-23 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Thu, Jun 23 2022, Thomas Huth wrote: > According chapter "3.1.1 Driver Requirements: Device Initialization" > of the Virtio specification (v1.1), a driver for a device has to set > the ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits in the status field after resetting > the device. The s390-ccw bios skipped

Re: [PATCH 1/2] pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio: Set missing status bits while initializing

2022-06-23 Thread Christian Borntraeger
Am 23.06.22 um 09:11 schrieb Thomas Huth: According chapter "3.1.1 Driver Requirements: Device Initialization" of the Virtio specification (v1.1), a driver for a device has to set the ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits in the status field after resetting the device. The s390-ccw bios skipped these

[PATCH 1/2] pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio: Set missing status bits while initializing

2022-06-23 Thread Thomas Huth
According chapter "3.1.1 Driver Requirements: Device Initialization" of the Virtio specification (v1.1), a driver for a device has to set the ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits in the status field after resetting the device. The s390-ccw bios skipped these steps so far and seems like QEMU never cared.