On 3/13/23 16:38, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
The code uses the wrong base for relative addressing: it should use the
target instruction address and not the EXECUTE's address.
Fix by storing the target instruction address in the new CPUS390XState
member and loading it from the code generated by
On 14.03.23 00:38, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
The code uses the wrong base for relative addressing: it should use the
target instruction address and not the EXECUTE's address.
Fix by storing the target instruction address in the new CPUS390XState
member and loading it from the code generated by
The code uses the wrong base for relative addressing: it should use the
target instruction address and not the EXECUTE's address.
Fix by storing the target instruction address in the new CPUS390XState
member and loading it from the code generated by in2_ri2().
Reported-by: Nina