Re: [PATCH 1/4] mc146818rtc: Make PF independent of PIE

2021-06-19 Thread Jason Thorpe
> On Jun 19, 2021, at 8:56 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > Do you mind reposting this single patch including the DS quote > in the description? Sure, no problem. Will do so shortly. -- thorpej

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mc146818rtc: Make PF independent of PIE

2021-06-19 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Hi Jason, On 6/16/21 7:34 PM, Jason Thorpe wrote: > >> On Jun 14, 2021, at 9:17 PM, Richard Henderson >> wrote: >> >> Cc: paolo and mst >> >> On 6/13/21 2:15 PM, Jason Thorpe wrote: >>> Make the PF flag behave like real hardware by always running the >>> periodic timer without regard to the set

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mc146818rtc: Make PF independent of PIE

2021-06-16 Thread Jason Thorpe
> On Jun 14, 2021, at 9:17 PM, Richard Henderson > wrote: > > Cc: paolo and mst > > On 6/13/21 2:15 PM, Jason Thorpe wrote: >> Make the PF flag behave like real hardware by always running the >> periodic timer without regard to the setting of the PIE bit, so >> that the PF will be set when th

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mc146818rtc: Make PF independent of PIE

2021-06-14 Thread Richard Henderson
Cc: paolo and mst On 6/13/21 2:15 PM, Jason Thorpe wrote: Make the PF flag behave like real hardware by always running the periodic timer without regard to the setting of the PIE bit, so that the PF will be set when the period expires even if an interrupt will not be raised. This behavior is do

[PATCH 1/4] mc146818rtc: Make PF independent of PIE

2021-06-13 Thread Jason Thorpe
Make the PF flag behave like real hardware by always running the periodic timer without regard to the setting of the PIE bit, so that the PF will be set when the period expires even if an interrupt will not be raised. This behavior is documented on page 16 of the MC146818A advance information data