Re: [PATCH 1/6] spapr: add spapr_machine_using_legacy_numa() helper

2020-09-24 Thread Greg Kurz
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:34:53 -0300 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > The changes to come to NUMA support are all guest visible. In > theory we could just create a new 5_1 class option flag to > avoid the changes to cascade to 5.1 and under. The reality is that > these changes are only relevant if

[PATCH 1/6] spapr: add spapr_machine_using_legacy_numa() helper

2020-09-23 Thread Daniel Henrique Barboza
The changes to come to NUMA support are all guest visible. In theory we could just create a new 5_1 class option flag to avoid the changes to cascade to 5.1 and under. The reality is that these changes are only relevant if the machine has more than one NUMA node. There is no need to change guest be