On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 06:31:11PM +0800, pet...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Peter Xu
>
> Now multifd's logic is designed to have no spurious wakeup. I still
> remember a talk to Juan and he seems to agree we should drop it now, and if
> my memory was right it was there because multifd used to hit
pet...@redhat.com writes:
> From: Peter Xu
>
> Now multifd's logic is designed to have no spurious wakeup. I still
> remember a talk to Juan and he seems to agree we should drop it now, and if
> my memory was right it was there because multifd used to hit that when
> still debugging.
>
> Let's d
From: Peter Xu
Now multifd's logic is designed to have no spurious wakeup. I still
remember a talk to Juan and he seems to agree we should drop it now, and if
my memory was right it was there because multifd used to hit that when
still debugging.
Let's drop it and see what can explode; as long
