On 5/21/23 23:39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 21/5/23 17:00, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 5/21/23 04:15, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 20/5/23 18:26, Richard Henderson wrote:
With the current structure of cputlb.c, there is no difference
between the little-endian and big-en
On 21/5/23 17:00, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 5/21/23 04:15, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 20/5/23 18:26, Richard Henderson wrote:
With the current structure of cputlb.c, there is no difference
between the little-endian and big-endian entry points, aside
from the assert. Unify
On 5/21/23 04:15, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 20/5/23 18:26, Richard Henderson wrote:
With the current structure of cputlb.c, there is no difference
between the little-endian and big-endian entry points, aside
from the assert. Unify the pairs of functions.
The only use of the
Hi Richard,
On 20/5/23 18:26, Richard Henderson wrote:
With the current structure of cputlb.c, there is no difference
between the little-endian and big-endian entry points, aside
from the assert. Unify the pairs of functions.
The only use of the functions with explicit endianness was in
target
With the current structure of cputlb.c, there is no difference
between the little-endian and big-endian entry points, aside
from the assert. Unify the pairs of functions.
The only use of the functions with explicit endianness was in
target/sparc64, and that was only to satisfy the assert.
Signed
