On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 09:56:08AM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 10:52:23AM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > This does get a bit complicated, which worries me a bit; the code here
> > > is already quite
* Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 10:52:23AM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > This does get a bit complicated, which worries me a bit; the code here
> > is already quite complicated.
>
> Right, it's the way I chose in this patchset on solving this problem.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 10:52:23AM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> This does get a bit complicated, which worries me a bit; the code here
> is already quite complicated.
Right, it's the way I chose in this patchset on solving this problem. Not
sure whether there's any better and easier
* Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> This patch enables postcopy-preempt feature.
>
> It contains two major changes to the migration logic:
>
> (1) Postcopy requests are now sent via a different socket from precopy
> background migration stream, so as to be isolated from very high page
>
This patch enables postcopy-preempt feature.
It contains two major changes to the migration logic:
(1) Postcopy requests are now sent via a different socket from precopy
background migration stream, so as to be isolated from very high page
request delays.
(2) For huge page enabled
