On 4/8/22 07:15, Peter Maydell wrote:
We were previously implementing INV (like INVALL) to just blow away
cached highest-priority-pending-LPI information on all connected
redistributors. For GICv4.0, this isn't going to be sufficient,
because the LPI we are invalidating cached information for
We were previously implementing INV (like INVALL) to just blow away
cached highest-priority-pending-LPI information on all connected
redistributors. For GICv4.0, this isn't going to be sufficient,
because the LPI we are invalidating cached information for might be
either physical or virtual, and