[PATCH 2/2] block: add missed block_acct_setup with new block device init procedure

Commit 5f76a7aac156ca75680dad5df4a385fd0b58f6b1 is looking harmless from the first glance, but it has changed things a lot. 'libvirt' uses it to detect that it should follow new initialization way and this changes things considerably. With this procedure followed, blockdev_init() is not called anym

Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: add missed block_acct_setup with new block device init procedure

On 8/23/22 12:57, Denis V. Lunev wrote: Commit 5f76a7aac156ca75680dad5df4a385fd0b58f6b1 is looking harmless from the first glance, but it has changed things a lot. 'libvirt' uses it to detect that it should follow new initialization way and this changes things considerably. With this procedure fo

[PATCH 2/2] block: add missed block_acct_setup with new block device init procedure

Commit 5f76a7aac156ca75680dad5df4a385fd0b58f6b1 is looking harmless from the first glance, but it has changed things a lot. 'libvirt' uses it to detect that it should follow new initialization way and this changes things considerably. With this procedure followed, blockdev_init() is not called anym

[PATCH 2/2] block: add missed block_acct_setup with new block device init procedure

Commit 5f76a7aac156ca75680dad5df4a385fd0b58f6b1 is looking harmless from the first glance, but it has changed things a lot. 'libvirt' uses it to detect that it should follow new initialization way and this changes things considerably. With this procedure followed, blockdev_init() is not called anym