Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 20/07/21 03:00, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Deceptively simple; all the work was in the previous patch writing up
>> the forwarding visitor. I still wonder if Kevin's QAPI aliases will
>> do this more gracefully, but if we're trying to justify this as a bug
>> fix worthy of
On 20/07/21 03:00, Eric Blake wrote:
Deceptively simple; all the work was in the previous patch writing up
the forwarding visitor. I still wonder if Kevin's QAPI aliases will
do this more gracefully, but if we're trying to justify this as a bug
fix worthy of 6.1, this is certainly a smaller
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 12:40:33PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Alias targets have a different name than the alias property itself
> (e.g. a machine's pflash0 might be an alias of a property named 'drive').
> When the target's getter or setter invokes the visitor, it will use
> a different name
On 7/19/21 12:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Alias targets have a different name than the alias property itself
> (e.g. a machine's pflash0 might be an alias of a property named 'drive').
> When the target's getter or setter invokes the visitor, it will use
> a different name than what the caller
Alias targets have a different name than the alias property itself
(e.g. a machine's pflash0 might be an alias of a property named 'drive').
When the target's getter or setter invokes the visitor, it will use
a different name than what the caller expects, and the visitor will
not be able to find
