On 1/26/22 9:06 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 22:05, Richard Henderson
wrote:
On 1/11/22 3:47 AM, Idan Horowitz wrote:
If the given range specifies no addresses to be flushed there's no reason
to schedule a function on all CPUs that does nothing.
Signed-off-by: Idan Horowit
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 22:05, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> On 1/11/22 3:47 AM, Idan Horowitz wrote:
> > If the given range specifies no addresses to be flushed there's no reason
> > to schedule a function on all CPUs that does nothing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Idan Horowitz
> > ---
> > target/arm
On 1/11/22 3:47 AM, Idan Horowitz wrote:
If the given range specifies no addresses to be flushed there's no reason
to schedule a function on all CPUs that does nothing.
Signed-off-by: Idan Horowitz
---
target/arm/helper.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/arm/hel
If the given range specifies no addresses to be flushed there's no reason
to schedule a function on all CPUs that does nothing.
Signed-off-by: Idan Horowitz
---
target/arm/helper.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index cfca0f5ba6.
