[PATCH 2/2] target/riscv: rvv-1.0: vf[w]redsum distinguish between ordered/unordered

2022-08-17 Thread Yang Liu
Starting with RVV1.0, the original vf[w]redsum_vs instruction was renamed to vf[w]redusum_vs. The distinction between ordered and unordered is also more consistent with other instructions, although there is no difference in implementation between the two for QEMU. Signed-off-by: Yang Liu --- tar

Re: [PATCH 2/2] target/riscv: rvv-1.0: vf[w]redsum distinguish between ordered/unordered

2022-09-22 Thread Alistair Francis
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 1:43 AM Yang Liu wrote: > > Starting with RVV1.0, the original vf[w]redsum_vs instruction was renamed > to vf[w]redusum_vs. The distinction between ordered and unordered is also > more consistent with other instructions, although there is no difference > in implementation b

Re: [PATCH 2/2] target/riscv: rvv-1.0: vf[w]redsum distinguish between ordered/unordered

2022-09-25 Thread Frank Chang
Reviewed-by: Frank Chang On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:45 PM Yang Liu wrote: > Starting with RVV1.0, the original vf[w]redsum_vs instruction was renamed > to vf[w]redusum_vs. The distinction between ordered and unordered is also > more consistent with other instructions, although there is no diffe

Re: [PATCH 2/2] target/riscv: rvv-1.0: vf[w]redsum distinguish between ordered/unordered

2022-09-25 Thread Alistair Francis
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 1:43 AM Yang Liu wrote: > > Starting with RVV1.0, the original vf[w]redsum_vs instruction was renamed > to vf[w]redusum_vs. The distinction between ordered and unordered is also > more consistent with other instructions, although there is no difference > in implementation b