Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 05.09.2023 17:50, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> virtio_load() as a whole should run in coroutine context because it
>> reads from the migration stream and we don't want this to block.
>> However, it calls virtio_set_features_nocheck() and devices don't
>> expect their
Am 17.10.2023 um 07:19 hat Michael Tokarev geschrieben:
> 05.09.2023 17:50, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > virtio_load() as a whole should run in coroutine context because it
> > reads from the migration stream and we don't want this to block.
> >
> > However, it calls virtio_set_features_nocheck() and
05.09.2023 17:50, Kevin Wolf wrote:
virtio_load() as a whole should run in coroutine context because it
reads from the migration stream and we don't want this to block.
However, it calls virtio_set_features_nocheck() and devices don't
expect their .set_features callback to run in a coroutine
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 10:59:48AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 07.09.2023 um 20:40 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 04:50:02PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > virtio_load() as a whole should run in coroutine context because it
> > > reads from the migration stream and
Am 07.09.2023 um 20:40 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 04:50:02PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > virtio_load() as a whole should run in coroutine context because it
> > reads from the migration stream and we don't want this to block.
>
> Is that "should" a "must" or a
On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 04:50:02PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> virtio_load() as a whole should run in coroutine context because it
> reads from the migration stream and we don't want this to block.
Is that "should" a "must" or a "can"?
If it's a "must" then virtio_load() needs
virtio_load() as a whole should run in coroutine context because it
reads from the migration stream and we don't want this to block.
However, it calls virtio_set_features_nocheck() and devices don't
expect their .set_features callback to run in a coroutine and therefore
call functions that may
