On 12/12/20 4:10 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 11/12/2020 21.30, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
Hi,
On 12/11/20 2:31 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
/dev/hwrng is only functional if virtio-rng is working right, so let's
add a sanity check for this device node.
Good idea.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 08:10:01 +0100
Thomas Huth wrote:
Minor nit: I think that the subject is a bit unwieldy. What about
"tests/acceptance: Test virtio-rng on s390 via /dev/hwrng"
?
> On 11/12/2020 21.30, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 12/11/20 2:31 PM, Thomas Huth wrote
On 11/12/2020 21.30, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/11/20 2:31 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> /dev/hwrng is only functional if virtio-rng is working right, so let's
>> add a sanity check for this device node.
>
> Good idea.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
>> ---
>> tests/acc
Hi,
On 12/11/20 2:31 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
/dev/hwrng is only functional if virtio-rng is working right, so let's
add a sanity check for this device node.
Good idea.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
---
tests/acceptance/machine_s390_ccw_virtio.py | 17 +++--
1 file changed, 15 in
/dev/hwrng is only functional if virtio-rng is working right, so let's
add a sanity check for this device node.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
---
tests/acceptance/machine_s390_ccw_virtio.py | 17 +++--
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/acceptance/machi
