Alistair Francis writes:
> I'm not sure common is the right name here, as it is really just ARM
> and RISC-V, but I don't have a better name to use.
We've already seen some interest for other architectures; Benjamin
Herrenschmidt was looking at using this for PPC, for instance. He got
stuck at t
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:00 PM Keith Packard via
wrote:
>
> This makes all of the internal interfaces architecture-independent and
> renames the internal functions to use the 'common_semi' prefix instead
> of 'arm' or 'arm_semi'.
>
> To do this, some new architecture-specific internal helper fun
This makes all of the internal interfaces architecture-independent and
renames the internal functions to use the 'common_semi' prefix instead
of 'arm' or 'arm_semi'.
To do this, some new architecture-specific internal helper functions
were created:
static inline target_ulong
common_semi_a
This makes all of the internal interfaces architecture-independent and
renames the internal functions to use the 'common_semi' prefix instead
of 'arm' or 'arm_semi'.
To do this, some new architecture-specific internal helper functions
were created:
static inline target_ulong
common_semi_a