On 18.06.21 22:16, Eric Blake wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 05:52:44PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
bdrv_co_block_status() does it for us, we do not need to do it here.
The advantage of not capping *pnum is that bdrv_co_block_status() can
cache larger data regions than requested by its caller.
We
17.06.2021 18:52, Max Reitz wrote:
bdrv_co_block_status() does it for us, we do not need to do it here.
The advantage of not capping *pnum is that bdrv_co_block_status() can
cache larger data regions than requested by its caller.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievs
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 05:52:44PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> bdrv_co_block_status() does it for us, we do not need to do it here.
>
> The advantage of not capping *pnum is that bdrv_co_block_status() can
> cache larger data regions than requested by its caller.
We should update the documentation
bdrv_co_block_status() does it for us, we do not need to do it here.
The advantage of not capping *pnum is that bdrv_co_block_status() can
cache larger data regions than requested by its caller.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
---
block/file-posix.c | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 dele
