Hello,
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
I can do that but waiting for a decision on how to proceed. Will Gerd
take my first series this is based on as is then this should be a
separate series doing the clean up using pci_get_function_0 or should
these two series be merged? I'd al
Hi,
> > I can do that but waiting for a decision on how to proceed. Will Gerd
> > take my first series this is based on as is then this should be a
> > separate series doing the clean up using pci_get_function_0 or should
> > these two series be merged? I'd also squash setting user_creatable =
>
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 10/17/21 20:44, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 10/15/21 03:06, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Use via_isa_set_irq() which better encapsulates irq handling in the
vt82xx model and avoids using isa_get_irq(
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 10/17/21 21:39, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 10/15/21 03:06, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Use via_isa_set_irq() which better encapsulates irq handling in the
vt82xx model and avoids using isa_get_irq(
On 10/17/21 20:44, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 10/15/21 03:06, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>>> Use via_isa_set_irq() which better encapsulates irq handling in the
>>> vt82xx model and avoids using isa_get_irq() that has a comment saying
>>> it should n
On 10/17/21 21:39, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 10/15/21 03:06, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>>> Use via_isa_set_irq() which better encapsulates irq handling in the
>>> vt82xx model and avoids using isa_get_irq() that has a comment saying
>>> it should n
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 10/15/21 03:06, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Use via_isa_set_irq() which better encapsulates irq handling in the
vt82xx model and avoids using isa_get_irq() that has a comment saying
it should not be used.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
---
hw/ide
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 10/15/21 03:06, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Use via_isa_set_irq() which better encapsulates irq handling in the
vt82xx model and avoids using isa_get_irq() that has a comment saying
it should not be used.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
---
hw/ide
On 10/15/21 03:06, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> Use via_isa_set_irq() which better encapsulates irq handling in the
> vt82xx model and avoids using isa_get_irq() that has a comment saying
> it should not be used.
>
> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
> ---
> hw/ide/via.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 ins
Use via_isa_set_irq() which better encapsulates irq handling in the
vt82xx model and avoids using isa_get_irq() that has a comment saying
it should not be used.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
---
hw/ide/via.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/ide/via.c b/h
10 matches
Mail list logo