On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 07:49:57PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Since we already have bitmap_mutex to protect either the dirty bitmap or
> > the clear log bitmap, we don't need atomic operations to set/clear/test on
> > the clear log bitmap. Swit
* Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Since we already have bitmap_mutex to protect either the dirty bitmap or
> the clear log bitmap, we don't need atomic operations to set/clear/test on
> the clear log bitmap. Switching all ops from atomic to non-atomic
> versions, meanwhile touch up the comme
Since we already have bitmap_mutex to protect either the dirty bitmap or
the clear log bitmap, we don't need atomic operations to set/clear/test on
the clear log bitmap. Switching all ops from atomic to non-atomic
versions, meanwhile touch up the comments to show which lock is in charge.
Introduc
