On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 07:20:24PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> I gave it a shot with a 24G guest, 8 vcpus, using 10g NIC as migration
> channel. When idle or dirty workload small, I don't observe major
> difference on total migration time. When with higher random dirty
> workload (800MB/s dirty rate
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 07:20:24PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> I kept the dirty sync in kvm_set_phys_mem() for kvmslot removals, left a
> comment on the known issue about strict dirty sync so we can fix it someday in
> the future together with dirty log and dirty ring.
Side note: patch 3,5-8 should n
I kept the dirty sync in kvm_set_phys_mem() for kvmslot removals, left a
comment on the known issue about strict dirty sync so we can fix it someday in
the future together with dirty log and dirty ring.
v3:
- added "KVM: Use a big lock to replace per-kml slots_lock"
this is preparing for the las
