On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 02:26:11PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 9:17 AM Peter Xu wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Jason,
> >
> > Mostly good to me, just a few nitpicks below.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 01:54:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > We introduce VTDBus structure as an inter
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 9:17 AM Peter Xu wrote:
>
> Hi, Jason,
>
> Mostly good to me, just a few nitpicks below.
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 01:54:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > We introduce VTDBus structure as an intermediate step for searching
> > the address space. This works well with SID b
Hi, Jason,
Mostly good to me, just a few nitpicks below.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 01:54:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We introduce VTDBus structure as an intermediate step for searching
> the address space. This works well with SID based matching/lookup. But
> when we want to support SID plus PA
We introduce VTDBus structure as an intermediate step for searching
the address space. This works well with SID based matching/lookup. But
when we want to support SID plus PASID based address space lookup,
this intermediate steps turns out to be a burden. So the patch simply
drops the VTDBus struct
