Hi Jean,
On 1/9/20 12:15 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 12:01:26PM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 1/9/20 11:40 AM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 09:58:49AM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
>> I share Peter's concern about having a differ
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 12:01:26PM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 1/9/20 11:40 AM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 09:58:49AM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
> I share Peter's concern about having a different default policy than x86.
> >>>
> >>> Yes I'd say just align
Hi,
On 1/9/20 11:40 AM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 09:58:49AM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
I share Peter's concern about having a different default policy than x86.
>>>
>>> Yes I'd say just align with whatever policy is already in place. Do you
>>> think we could add a
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 09:58:49AM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
> >> I share Peter's concern about having a different default policy than x86.
> >
> > Yes I'd say just align with whatever policy is already in place. Do you
> > think we could add a command-line option to let people disable
> > default-
Hi Jean,
On 1/9/20 9:47 AM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 05:55:52PM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Jean-Philippe, Peter,
>>
>> On 1/7/20 11:10 AM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 12:58:50PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:06
On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 05:55:52PM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Jean-Philippe, Peter,
>
> On 1/7/20 11:10 AM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 12:58:50PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:06:34PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Dec 20
Hi Jean-Philippe, Peter,
On 1/7/20 11:10 AM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 12:58:50PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:06:34PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 11:51:00AM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 12:58:50PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:06:34PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 11:51:00AM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 05:26:42PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > > There is at the virti
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:06:34PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 11:51:00AM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 05:26:42PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > There is at the virtio transport level: the driver sets status to
> > > FEATURES_OK onc
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 11:51:00AM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 05:26:42PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > There is at the virtio transport level: the driver sets status to
> > FEATURES_OK once it accepted the feature bits, and to DRIVER_OK once its
> > fully operational
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 05:26:42PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> There is at the virtio transport level: the driver sets status to
> FEATURES_OK once it accepted the feature bits, and to DRIVER_OK once its
> fully operational. The virtio-iommu spec says:
>
> If the driver does not accept
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 04:09:47PM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
> >> @@ -412,19 +412,80 @@ static IOMMUTLBEntry
> >> virtio_iommu_translate(IOMMUMemoryRegion *mr, hwaddr addr,
> >> int iommu_idx)
> >> {
> >> IOMMUDevice *sdev = con
Hi Peter, jean,
On 12/19/19 3:49 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 03:38:34PM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On 12/19/19 2:33 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:30:40AM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 12/10/19 8:33 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
>
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 03:38:34PM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 12/19/19 2:33 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:30:40AM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >> On 12/10/19 8:33 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 07:29:31PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote
Hi Peter,
On 12/19/19 2:33 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:30:40AM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>> On 12/10/19 8:33 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 07:29:31PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
This patch implements the translate callback
Signed-off-b
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:30:40AM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> On 12/10/19 8:33 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 07:29:31PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> This patch implements the translate callback
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> v10 -> v11:
>
Hi Peter,
On 12/10/19 8:33 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 07:29:31PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
>> This patch implements the translate callback
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
>>
>> ---
>>
>> v10 -> v11:
>> - take into account the new value struct and use
>> g_tree_lookup_extended
>
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 07:29:31PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> This patch implements the translate callback
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
>
> ---
>
> v10 -> v11:
> - take into account the new value struct and use
> g_tree_lookup_extended
> - switched to error_report_once
>
> v6 -> v7:
> - imp
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 07:29:31PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> This patch implements the translate callback
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker
This patch implements the translate callback
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
---
v10 -> v11:
- take into account the new value struct and use
g_tree_lookup_extended
- switched to error_report_once
v6 -> v7:
- implemented bypass-mode
v5 -> v6:
- replace error_report by qemu_log_mask
v4 -> v5:
- c
20 matches
Mail list logo
