On 11/21/22 14:37, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 11/12/22 03:11, Richard Henderson wrote:
Note that the previous direct reference to reserve_val,
- tcg_gen_ld_i64(t1, cpu_env, (ctx->le_mode
- ? offsetof(CPUPPCState, reserve_val2)
-
On 11/12/22 03:11, Richard Henderson wrote:
Note that the previous direct reference to reserve_val,
- tcg_gen_ld_i64(t1, cpu_env, (ctx->le_mode
-? offsetof(CPUPPCState, reserve_val2)
-: offsetof(CPUPPCState, reserve_val)));
On 11/16/22 23:48, Richard Henderson wrote:
I think you missed the Based-on tag.
r~
Duh. Sorry about that. Let me try it again.
Daniel
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022, 05:38 Daniel Henrique Barboza, mailto:danielhb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Richard,
I believe the ppc64-linux-user target
I think you missed the Based-on tag.
r~
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022, 05:38 Daniel Henrique Barboza,
wrote:
> Richard,
>
> I believe the ppc64-linux-user target didn't like what you did in this
> patch. Here's the error:
>
> $ ../configure
>
Richard,
I believe the ppc64-linux-user target didn't like what you did in this
patch. Here's the error:
$ ../configure
--target-list=ppc64-softmmu,ppc64-linux-user,ppc-softmmu,ppc-linux-user,ppc64le-linux-user
$ make -j
(...)
[15/133] Compiling C object
Note that the previous direct reference to reserve_val,
- tcg_gen_ld_i64(t1, cpu_env, (ctx->le_mode
-? offsetof(CPUPPCState, reserve_val2)
-: offsetof(CPUPPCState, reserve_val)));
was incorrect because all references should have
