On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 06:25:53PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
>
> On 7/19/21 13:57, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:46:38PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > > This fixes NEGATIVE_RETURNS, OVERRUN issues reported by the Coverity.
> > >
> > > This adds a comment
On 7/19/21 13:57, David Gibson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:46:38PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
This fixes NEGATIVE_RETURNS, OVERRUN issues reported by the Coverity.
This adds a comment about the return parameters number in the VOF hcall.
The reason for such counting is to keep t
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 23:46:38 +1000
Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> This fixes NEGATIVE_RETURNS, OVERRUN issues reported by the Coverity.
>
> This adds a comment about the return parameters number in the VOF hcall.
> The reason for such counting is to keep the numbers look the same in
> vof_client_
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:46:38PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> This fixes NEGATIVE_RETURNS, OVERRUN issues reported by the Coverity.
>
> This adds a comment about the return parameters number in the VOF hcall.
> The reason for such counting is to keep the numbers look the same in
> vof_cl
This fixes NEGATIVE_RETURNS, OVERRUN issues reported by the Coverity.
This adds a comment about the return parameters number in the VOF hcall.
The reason for such counting is to keep the numbers look the same in
vof_client_handle() and the Linux (an OF client).
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy
