m Sethi ; Andy Currid ;
> > > qemu-...@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Gavin Shan
> > > ; ira.we...@intel.com; navneet.si...@intel.com
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory
> > >
> > >
> >
i ; Andy Currid ;
> > > qemu-...@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Gavin Shan
> > > ; ira.we...@intel.com; navneet.si...@intel.com
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 10:5
non.zha...@gmail.com;
> > peter.mayd...@linaro.org; a...@anisinha.ca; Aniket Agashe
> > ; Neo Jia ; Kirti Wankhede
> > ; Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU) ;
> > Vikram Sethi ; Andy Currid ;
> > qemu-...@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Gavin Shan
> > ; ira.we...@intel.com; navneet.si.
non.zha...@gmail.com;
> > peter.mayd...@linaro.org; a...@anisinha.ca; Aniket Agashe
> > ; Neo Jia ; Kirti Wankhede
> > ; Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU) ;
> > Vikram Sethi ; Andy Currid ;
> > qemu-...@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Gavin Shan
> > ; ira.we...@intel.com; navneet.si.
non.zha...@gmail.com;
> > peter.mayd...@linaro.org; a...@anisinha.ca; Aniket Agashe
> > ; Neo Jia ; Kirti Wankhede
> > ; Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU) ;
> > Vikram Sethi ; Andy Currid ;
> > qemu-...@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Gavin Shan
> > ; ira.we...@intel.com; navneet
Neo Jia ; Kirti Wankhede
> ; Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU) ;
> Vikram Sethi ; Andy Currid ;
> qemu-...@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Gavin Shan
> ; ira.we...@intel.com; navneet.si...@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory
>
>
> On Wed, 27
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 10:53:36 -0300
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:33:18PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> > CXL accelerators / GPUs etc are a different question but who has one
> > of those anyway? :)
>
> That's exactly what I mean when I say CXL will need it too. I ke
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:33:18PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> CXL accelerators / GPUs etc are a different question but who has one
> of those anyway? :)
That's exactly what I mean when I say CXL will need it too. I keep
describing this current Grace & Hopper as pre-CXL HW. You can easially
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 07:14:28 +
Ankit Agrawal wrote:
> > >
> > > Based on the suggestions here, can we consider something like the
> > > following?
> > > 1. Introduce a new -numa subparam 'devnode', which tells Qemu to mark
> > > the node with MEM_AFFINITY_HOTPLUGGABLE in the SRAT's memory aff
> >
> > Based on the suggestions here, can we consider something like the
> > following?
> > 1. Introduce a new -numa subparam 'devnode', which tells Qemu to mark
> > the node with MEM_AFFINITY_HOTPLUGGABLE in the SRAT's memory affinity
> > structure to make it hotpluggable.
>
> Is that "devnode=on
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 18:54:53 +0200
David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 26.09.23 16:52, Ankit Agrawal wrote:
> > Good idea. Fundamentally the device should not be creating NUMA
> > nodes, the VM should be configured with NUMA nodes and the device
> > memory associated with those nodes.
>
On 26.09.23 16:52, Ankit Agrawal wrote:
Good idea. Fundamentally the device should not be creating NUMA
nodes, the VM should be configured with NUMA nodes and the device
memory associated with those nodes.
+1. That would also make it fly with DIMMs and virtio-mem, where you
would want NUMA-les
Good idea. Fundamentally the device should not be creating NUMA
nodes, the VM should be configured with NUMA nodes and the device
memory associated with those nodes.
>>>
>>> +1. That would also make it fly with DIMMs and virtio-mem, where you
>>> would want NUMA-less nodes ass well
On 22.09.23 10:11, Ankit Agrawal wrote:
Typically, a command line for a virt machine with NUMA nodes would
look like :
-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram-node0,size=1G \
-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram-node0 \
-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram-node1,size=1G \
-numa node,nodeid
> >>
> >> Typically, a command line for a virt machine with NUMA nodes would
> >> look like :
> >>
> >> -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram-node0,size=1G \
> >> -numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram-node0 \
> >> -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram-node1,size=1G \
> >> -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=
On 15.09.23 16:47, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 16:19:29 +0200
Cédric Le Goater wrote:
Hello Ankit,
On 9/15/23 04:45, ank...@nvidia.com wrote:
From: Ankit Agrawal
For devices which allow CPU to cache coherently access their memory,
it is sensible to expose such memory as NUMA
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 16:19:29 +0200
Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> Hello Ankit,
>
> On 9/15/23 04:45, ank...@nvidia.com wrote:
> > From: Ankit Agrawal
> >
> > For devices which allow CPU to cache coherently access their memory,
> > it is sensible to expose such memory as NUMA nodes separate from
> >
Hello Ankit,
On 9/15/23 04:45, ank...@nvidia.com wrote:
From: Ankit Agrawal
For devices which allow CPU to cache coherently access their memory,
it is sensible to expose such memory as NUMA nodes separate from
the sysmem node. Qemu currently do not provide a mechanism for creation
of NUMA node
From: Ankit Agrawal
For devices which allow CPU to cache coherently access their memory,
it is sensible to expose such memory as NUMA nodes separate from
the sysmem node. Qemu currently do not provide a mechanism for creation
of NUMA nodes associated with a vfio-pci device.
Implement a mechanism
19 matches
Mail list logo