On Thu, 30 Nov 2023, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
If you mean generally harden the code we haven't fixed up for
big endian systems then fair enough - that indeed needs doing.
Yes, that was a braino, sorry for the confusion.
Tricky to be sure we got it all right though unless we have a big
endian
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 12:27:02 -0800
Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
>
> >In the current mdev_reg_read() implementation, it consistently returns
> >that the Media Status is Ready (01b). This was fine until commit
> >25a52959f99d ("hw/cxl: Add support for device s
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
All of them make sense to me. I will adjust, thanks!
But I'm not confident enough to write a single description for all the
changes so will
split it into a few patches. May I add your Suggested-by (or
Signed-off-by) in v2
as it will contain some part of
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 5:27 AM Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
>
> >In the current mdev_reg_read() implementation, it consistently returns
> >that the Media Status is Ready (01b). This was fine until commit
> >25a52959f99d ("hw/cxl: Add support for device sani
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
In the current mdev_reg_read() implementation, it consistently returns
that the Media Status is Ready (01b). This was fine until commit
25a52959f99d ("hw/cxl: Add support for device sanitation") because the
media was presumed to be ready.
However, as pe
In the current mdev_reg_read() implementation, it consistently returns
that the Media Status is Ready (01b). This was fine until commit
25a52959f99d ("hw/cxl: Add support for device sanitation") because the
media was presumed to be ready.
However, as per the CXL 3.0 spec "8.2.9.8.5.1 Sanitize (Opc
