On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:09:15 +0100
David Hildenbrand wrote:
> legacy_s390_alloc() was required for dealing with the absence of the ESOP
> feature -- on old HW (< gen 10) and old z/VM versions (< 6.3).
>
> As z/VM v6.2 (and even v6.3) is no longer supported since 2017 [1]
> and we don't expect
On 03.03.21 14:09, David Hildenbrand wrote:
legacy_s390_alloc() was required for dealing with the absence of the ESOP
feature -- on old HW (< gen 10) and old z/VM versions (< 6.3).
As z/VM v6.2 (and even v6.3) is no longer supported since 2017 [1]
and we don't expect to have real users on
On 03/03/2021 14.09, David Hildenbrand wrote:
legacy_s390_alloc() was required for dealing with the absence of the ESOP
feature -- on old HW (< gen 10) and old z/VM versions (< 6.3).
As z/VM v6.2 (and even v6.3) is no longer supported since 2017 [1]
and we don't expect to have real users on
legacy_s390_alloc() was required for dealing with the absence of the ESOP
feature -- on old HW (< gen 10) and old z/VM versions (< 6.3).
As z/VM v6.2 (and even v6.3) is no longer supported since 2017 [1]
and we don't expect to have real users on such old hardware, let's drop
legacy_s390_alloc().
