On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 02:37:22 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin"
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 03:15:16PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 02:12:36 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > subject seems wrong.
> >
> >
> > Will fix.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 03:15:16PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 02:12:36 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> wrote:
> >
> > subject seems wrong.
>
>
> Will fix.
>
>
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 10:51:49AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > > In the current design, we stop the device fr
On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 02:12:36 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin"
wrote:
>
> subject seems wrong.
Will fix.
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 10:51:49AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > In the current design, we stop the device from operating on the vring
> > during per-queue reset by resetting the structure Vir
subject seems wrong.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 10:51:49AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> In the current design, we stop the device from operating on the vring
> during per-queue reset by resetting the structure VirtQueue.
>
> But before the reset operation, when recycling some resources, we should
> s
In the current design, we stop the device from operating on the vring
during per-queue reset by resetting the structure VirtQueue.
But before the reset operation, when recycling some resources, we should
stop referencing new vring resources. For example, when recycling
virtio-net's asynchronous se