On 9/25/22 13:02, Alex Bennée wrote:
I'm not keen on adding another field like this.
Hmm I thought it was unavoidable from Edgar's comment:
"CPU's can also have a Master-IDs (Requester IDs) which are unrelated to
the Clusters CPU index. This is used for example in the Xilinx ZynqMP
an
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 9/22/22 14:58, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> We currently have hacks across the hw/ to reference current_cpu to
>> work out what the current accessing CPU is. This breaks in some cases
>> including using gdbstub to access HW state. As we have MemTxAttrs to
>> describe det
On 9/22/22 14:58, Alex Bennée wrote:
We currently have hacks across the hw/ to reference current_cpu to
work out what the current accessing CPU is. This breaks in some cases
including using gdbstub to access HW state. As we have MemTxAttrs to
describe details about the access lets extend it to me
We currently have hacks across the hw/ to reference current_cpu to
work out what the current accessing CPU is. This breaks in some cases
including using gdbstub to access HW state. As we have MemTxAttrs to
describe details about the access lets extend it to mention if this is
a CPU access and which