Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 06/08/20 10:59, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> bool stopped = false;
>>> -
>>> +bool bql = !qemu_mutex_iothread_locked();
>>> +if (bql) {
>>> +qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
>>> +}
>> I'm not sure I like that conditional locking. Can we instead create
On 06/08/20 10:59, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> bool stopped = false;
>> -
>> +bool bql = !qemu_mutex_iothread_locked();
>> +if (bql) {
>> +qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
>> +}
> I'm not sure I like that conditional locking. Can we instead create
> __s390_cpu_do_interrupt() or so,
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 14:12:59 -0400
Robert Foley wrote:
> This is part of a series of changes to remove the implied BQL
> from the common code of cpu_handle_interrupt and
> cpu_handle_exception. As part of removing the implied BQL
> from the common code, we are pushing the BQL holding
> down into
This is part of a series of changes to remove the implied BQL
from the common code of cpu_handle_interrupt and
cpu_handle_exception. As part of removing the implied BQL
from the common code, we are pushing the BQL holding
down into the per-arch implementation functions of
do_interrupt and cpu_exec
