On 22.12.20 19:00, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
22.12.2020 19:07, Max Reitz wrote:
On 16.12.20 07:17, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
The code already don't freeze base node and we try to make it prepared
for the situation when base node is changed during the operation. In
other word
22.12.2020 21:00, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
We shouldn't have use-cases when backing-fmt is set to something another than
final base node.
I mean, we shouldn't have use-cases when backing-file is [...]
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
22.12.2020 19:07, Max Reitz wrote:
On 16.12.20 07:17, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
The code already don't freeze base node and we try to make it prepared
for the situation when base node is changed during the operation. In
other words, block-stream doesn't own base node.
Let's introduce
On 16.12.20 07:17, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
The code already don't freeze base node and we try to make it prepared
for the situation when base node is changed during the operation. In
other words, block-stream doesn't own base node.
Let's introduce a new interface which should replace
The code already don't freeze base node and we try to make it prepared
for the situation when base node is changed during the operation. In
other words, block-stream doesn't own base node.
Let's introduce a new interface which should replace the current one,
which will in better relations with the
