On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 07:32:55AM -0500, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 03:21:51PM +0300, Roman Bolshakov wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 05:39:09PM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> > > From: Eduardo Habkost
> > >
> > > The TCG-specific CPU methods will be moved to a separate
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 03:21:51PM +0300, Roman Bolshakov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 05:39:09PM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> > From: Eduardo Habkost
> >
> > The TCG-specific CPU methods will be moved to a separate struct,
> > to make it easier to move accel-specific code outside generic
On 2/10/21 1:21 PM, Roman Bolshakov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 05:39:09PM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> From: Eduardo Habkost
>>
>> The TCG-specific CPU methods will be moved to a separate struct,
>> to make it easier to move accel-specific code outside generic CPU
>> code in the future.
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 05:39:09PM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> From: Eduardo Habkost
>
> The TCG-specific CPU methods will be moved to a separate struct,
> to make it easier to move accel-specific code outside generic CPU
> code in the future. Start by moving tcg_initialize().
>
> The new C
From: Eduardo Habkost
The TCG-specific CPU methods will be moved to a separate struct,
to make it easier to move accel-specific code outside generic CPU
code in the future. Start by moving tcg_initialize().
The new CPUClass.tcg_opts field may eventually become a pointer,
but keep it an embedded
