On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 14:09:12 +0100
Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 21. Januar 2021 19:15:10 CET Greg Kurz wrote:
> > If a fid was actually re-opened by v9fs_reopen_fid(), we re-traverse the
> > fid list from the head in case some other request created a fid that
> > needs to be mark
On Donnerstag, 21. Januar 2021 19:15:10 CET Greg Kurz wrote:
> If a fid was actually re-opened by v9fs_reopen_fid(), we re-traverse the
> fid list from the head in case some other request created a fid that
> needs to be marked unreclaimable as well (ie. the client opened a new
That's "i.e.". Not
If a fid was actually re-opened by v9fs_reopen_fid(), we re-traverse the
fid list from the head in case some other request created a fid that
needs to be marked unreclaimable as well (ie. the client opened a new
handle on the path that is being unlinked). This is suboptimal since
most if not all fi
