On 10/24/23 13:51, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 24/10/2023 12.37, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Markus Armbruster writes:
Thomas Huth writes:
No need to declare a new variable in the the inner code block
here, we can re-use the "ret" variable that has been declared
at the beginning of the function. Wi
On 24/10/2023 12.37, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Markus Armbruster writes:
Thomas Huth writes:
No need to declare a new variable in the the inner code block
here, we can re-use the "ret" variable that has been declared
at the beginning of the function. With this change, the code
can now be suc
Markus Armbruster writes:
> Thomas Huth writes:
>
>> No need to declare a new variable in the the inner code block
>> here, we can re-use the "ret" variable that has been declared
>> at the beginning of the function. With this change, the code
>> can now be successfully compiled with -Wshadow=lo
Thomas Huth writes:
> No need to declare a new variable in the the inner code block
> here, we can re-use the "ret" variable that has been declared
> at the beginning of the function. With this change, the code
> can now be successfully compiled with -Wshadow=local again.
>
> Fixes: a32e781838 ("
No need to declare a new variable in the the inner code block
here, we can re-use the "ret" variable that has been declared
at the beginning of the function. With this change, the code
can now be successfully compiled with -Wshadow=local again.
Fixes: a32e781838 ("Mark bdrv_snapshot_fallback() and
