On 02/05/2024 09.57, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 4/30/24 21:08, Thomas Huth wrote:
The sclpconsole currently does not have a proper parent in the QOM
tree, so it shows up under /machine/unattached - which is somewhat
ugly. We should rather attach it to /machine/sclp/s390-sclp-event-facility
where
On 4/30/24 21:08, Thomas Huth wrote:
The sclpconsole currently does not have a proper parent in the QOM
tree, so it shows up under /machine/unattached - which is somewhat
ugly. We should rather attach it to /machine/sclp/s390-sclp-event-facility
where the other devices of type TYPE_SCLP_EVENT alr
On Tue, 2024-04-30 at 21:08 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The sclpconsole currently does not have a proper parent in the QOM
> tree, so it shows up under /machine/unattached - which is somewhat
> ugly. We should rather attach it to /machine/sclp/s390-sclp-event-
> facility
> where the other devices o
On 30/4/24 21:08, Thomas Huth wrote:
The sclpconsole currently does not have a proper parent in the QOM
tree, so it shows up under /machine/unattached - which is somewhat
ugly. We should rather attach it to /machine/sclp/s390-sclp-event-facility
where the other devices of type TYPE_SCLP_EVENT alr
On 30.04.24 21:08, Thomas Huth wrote:
The sclpconsole currently does not have a proper parent in the QOM
tree, so it shows up under /machine/unattached - which is somewhat
ugly. We should rather attach it to /machine/sclp/s390-sclp-event-facility
where the other devices of type TYPE_SCLP_EVENT al
The sclpconsole currently does not have a proper parent in the QOM
tree, so it shows up under /machine/unattached - which is somewhat
ugly. We should rather attach it to /machine/sclp/s390-sclp-event-facility
where the other devices of type TYPE_SCLP_EVENT already reside.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hut