Re: [PATCH v2] s390x: pv: Fence additional unavailable SCLP facilities for PV guests

2020-12-14 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 05:51:09 -0500 Janosch Frank wrote: > There's no VSIE support for a protected guest, so let's better not > advertise it and its support facilities. > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank > --- > v2: added hpma2 > --- > target/s390x/cpu_features.c | 39

Re: [PATCH v2] s390x: pv: Fence additional unavailable SCLP facilities for PV guests

2020-12-14 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 11.12.20 11:51, Janosch Frank wrote: > There's no VSIE support for a protected guest, so let's better not > advertise it and its support facilities. > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand -- Thanks, David / dhildenb

Re: [PATCH v2] s390x: pv: Fence additional unavailable SCLP facilities for PV guests

2020-12-11 Thread Janosch Frank
On 12/11/20 12:28 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 11.12.20 11:51, Janosch Frank wrote: >> There's no VSIE support for a protected guest, so let's better not >> advertise it and its support facilities. >> >> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank > > Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger > >

Re: [PATCH v2] s390x: pv: Fence additional unavailable SCLP facilities for PV guests

2020-12-11 Thread Christian Borntraeger
On 11.12.20 11:51, Janosch Frank wrote: > There's no VSIE support for a protected guest, so let's better not > advertise it and its support facilities. > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger shall we add Fixes: 0f73c5b30b8b ("s390x: protvirt: SCLP

[PATCH v2] s390x: pv: Fence additional unavailable SCLP facilities for PV guests

2020-12-11 Thread Janosch Frank
There's no VSIE support for a protected guest, so let's better not advertise it and its support facilities. Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank --- v2: added hpma2 --- target/s390x/cpu_features.c | 39 - target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 25 ++-- 2