On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 10:44, Michal Orzel wrote:
>
> On an attempt to access CNTPCT_EL0 from EL0 using a guest running on top
> of Xen, a trap from EL2 was observed which is something not reproducible
> on HW (also, Xen does not trap accesses to physical counter).
>
> This is because gt_counter_
On 28.09.23 12:44, Michal Orzel wrote:
Hello Michal
> On an attempt to access CNTPCT_EL0 from EL0 using a guest running on top
> of Xen, a trap from EL2 was observed which is something not reproducible
> on HW (also, Xen does not trap accesses to physical counter).
>
> This is because gt_count
On an attempt to access CNTPCT_EL0 from EL0 using a guest running on top
of Xen, a trap from EL2 was observed which is something not reproducible
on HW (also, Xen does not trap accesses to physical counter).
This is because gt_counter_access() checks for an incorrect bit (1
instead of 0) of CNTHCT