On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 11:14 PM Rob Bradford wrote:
>
> The previous check was failing with:
>
> VLEN=128 ELEN = 64 SEW = 16 and LMUL = 1/8 which is a
> valid combination.
>
> Fix the check to allow valid combinations when VLEN is a multiple of
> ELEN.
>
> From the specification:
>
> "In
On 2023/7/18 21:11, Rob Bradford wrote:
The previous check was failing with:
VLEN=128 ELEN = 64 SEW = 16 and LMUL = 1/8 which is a
valid combination.
Fix the check to allow valid combinations when VLEN is a multiple of
ELEN.
From the specification:
"In general, the requirement is to
The previous check was failing with:
VLEN=128 ELEN = 64 SEW = 16 and LMUL = 1/8 which is a
valid combination.
Fix the check to allow valid combinations when VLEN is a multiple of
ELEN.
>From the specification:
"In general, the requirement is to support LMUL ≥ SEWMIN/ELEN, where
SEWMIN is the
