Am 16.02.2022 um 13:54 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben:
> Instead of failing the iotests if GNU sed is not available (or skipping
> them completely in the check-block.sh script), it would be better to
> simply skip the bash-based tests that rely on GNU sed, so that the other
> tests could still be
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 01:54:54PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Instead of failing the iotests if GNU sed is not available (or skipping
> them completely in the check-block.sh script), it would be better to
> simply skip the bash-based tests that rely on GNU sed, so that the other
> tests could
On 16/2/22 13:54, Thomas Huth wrote:
Instead of failing the iotests if GNU sed is not available (or skipping
them completely in the check-block.sh script), it would be better to
simply skip the bash-based tests that rely on GNU sed, so that the other
tests could still be run. Thus we now
Instead of failing the iotests if GNU sed is not available (or skipping
them completely in the check-block.sh script), it would be better to
simply skip the bash-based tests that rely on GNU sed, so that the other
tests could still be run. Thus we now explicitely use "gsed" (either as
direct
