Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] virtiofsd: Allow using file handles instead of O_PATH FDs

2021-06-16 Thread Max Reitz
On 11.06.21 21:19, Vivek Goyal wrote: On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 05:55:42PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote: Hi, v1 cover letter for an overview: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs/2021-June/msg00033.html Hi Max, What's the impact of these patches on performance? Just trying to get some idea w

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] virtiofsd: Allow using file handles instead of O_PATH FDs

2021-06-11 Thread Vivek Goyal
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 05:55:42PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote: > Hi, > > v1 cover letter for an overview: > https://listman.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs/2021-June/msg00033.html Hi Max, What's the impact of these patches on performance? Just trying to get some idea what to expect. Performance remai

[PATCH v2 0/9] virtiofsd: Allow using file handles instead of O_PATH FDs

2021-06-09 Thread Max Reitz
Hi, v1 cover letter for an overview: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs/2021-June/msg00033.html In v2, I (tried to) fix the bug Dave found, which is that get_file_handle() indiscriminately opened the given dirfd/name combination to get an O_RDONLY fd without checking whether we’re actu