On 26.09.22 15:38, Alex Bennée wrote:
We currently have hacks across the hw/ to reference current_cpu to
work out what the current accessing CPU is. This breaks in some cases
including using gdbstub to access HW state. As we have MemTxAttrs to
describe details about the access lets extend it
On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 16:24, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
>
> Peter Maydell writes:
> > I still don't see anything in this patchset that updates
> > the code which currently assumes requester_id to be a PCI
> > index to check that it hasn't been handed a MemTxAttrs
> > that uses requester_id as a CPU
Peter Maydell writes:
> On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 15:13, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> We currently have hacks across the hw/ to reference current_cpu to
>> work out what the current accessing CPU is. This breaks in some cases
>> including using gdbstub to access HW state. As we have MemTxAttrs to
On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 15:13, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> We currently have hacks across the hw/ to reference current_cpu to
> work out what the current accessing CPU is. This breaks in some cases
> including using gdbstub to access HW state. As we have MemTxAttrs to
> describe details about the
We currently have hacks across the hw/ to reference current_cpu to
work out what the current accessing CPU is. This breaks in some cases
including using gdbstub to access HW state. As we have MemTxAttrs to
describe details about the access lets extend it to mention if this is
a CPU access and
