On 10/6/23 20:10, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
On 06.10.23 11:56, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 05.10.2023 um 21:55 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
On 11.09.23 12:46, Kevin Wolf wrote:
When the permission related BlockDriver callbacks are called, we
are in
the middle of an operatio
On 06.10.23 11:56, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 05.10.2023 um 21:55 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
On 11.09.23 12:46, Kevin Wolf wrote:
When the permission related BlockDriver callbacks are called, we are in
the middle of an operation traversing the block graph. Polling in such a
place i
Am 05.10.2023 um 21:55 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> On 11.09.23 12:46, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > When the permission related BlockDriver callbacks are called, we are in
> > the middle of an operation traversing the block graph. Polling in such a
> > place is a very bad idea because t
On 11.09.23 12:46, Kevin Wolf wrote:
When the permission related BlockDriver callbacks are called, we are in
the middle of an operation traversing the block graph. Polling in such a
place is a very bad idea because the graph could change in unexpected
ways. In the future, callers will also hold t
When the permission related BlockDriver callbacks are called, we are in
the middle of an operation traversing the block graph. Polling in such a
place is a very bad idea because the graph could change in unexpected
ways. In the future, callers will also hold the graph lock, which is
likely to turn
