On 5/17/21 5:21 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
-#define UNAME_MACHINE "sparc"
+#ifdef TARGET_SPARC64
+# define UNAME_MACHINE "sparc64"
+#else
+# define UNAME_MACHINE "sparc"
+#endif
#define UNAME_MINIMUM_RELEASE "2.6.32"
Is it intended to have now an uname defined to "sparc64" with sparc32plus?
On 26/04/2021 04:53, Richard Henderson wrote:
> There are only a few differences in sparc32 vs sparc64.
> This fixes target_shmlba for sparc32plus, which is v9.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> ---
> linux-user/sparc/target_syscall.h | 42 +
>
There are only a few differences in sparc32 vs sparc64.
This fixes target_shmlba for sparc32plus, which is v9.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
linux-user/sparc/target_syscall.h | 42 +
linux-user/sparc64/target_syscall.h | 36 +
2 files