Re: [PATCH v2 07/53] migration/rdma: Clean up two more harmless signed vs. unsigned issues

2023-10-06 Thread Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
On 28/09/2023 21:19, Markus Armbruster wrote: > qemu_rdma_exchange_get_response() compares int parameter @expecting > with uint32_t head->type. Actual arguments are non-negative > enumeration constants, RDMAControlHeader uint32_t member type, or > qemu_rdma_exchange_recv() int parameter expectin

Re: [PATCH v2 07/53] migration/rdma: Clean up two more harmless signed vs. unsigned issues

2023-10-04 Thread Juan Quintela
Markus Armbruster wrote: > qemu_rdma_exchange_get_response() compares int parameter @expecting > with uint32_t head->type. Actual arguments are non-negative > enumeration constants, RDMAControlHeader uint32_t member type, or > qemu_rdma_exchange_recv() int parameter expecting. Actual arguments >

[PATCH v2 07/53] migration/rdma: Clean up two more harmless signed vs. unsigned issues

2023-09-28 Thread Markus Armbruster
qemu_rdma_exchange_get_response() compares int parameter @expecting with uint32_t head->type. Actual arguments are non-negative enumeration constants, RDMAControlHeader uint32_t member type, or qemu_rdma_exchange_recv() int parameter expecting. Actual arguments for the latter are non-negative enu