On 7/3/21 4:16 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 03/07/2021 14:10, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 7/3/21 2:04 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>>> I've tested this under Linux/m68k, NetBSD/arc and MacOS and networking
>>> seems fine after a quick test in each OS. The slight curiosity is that
>>> th
On 03/07/2021 14:10, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 7/3/21 2:04 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 03/07/2021 09:52, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 7/3/21 8:21 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 02/07/2021 05:36, Finn Thain wrote:
On 6/25/21 8:53 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
Commit 3fe9a838ec "
On 7/3/21 2:04 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 03/07/2021 09:52, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 7/3/21 8:21 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>>> On 02/07/2021 05:36, Finn Thain wrote:
>>>
> On 6/25/21 8:53 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> Commit 3fe9a838ec "dp8393x: Always use 32-bit accesse
On 03/07/2021 09:52, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 7/3/21 8:21 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 02/07/2021 05:36, Finn Thain wrote:
On 6/25/21 8:53 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
Commit 3fe9a838ec "dp8393x: Always use 32-bit accesses" assumed that
all accesses to the registers were 32-bit
No
On 7/3/21 8:21 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 02/07/2021 05:36, Finn Thain wrote:
>
>>> On 6/25/21 8:53 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
Commit 3fe9a838ec "dp8393x: Always use 32-bit accesses" assumed that
all accesses to the registers were 32-bit
>>
>> No, that assumption was not made ther
On 02/07/2021 05:36, Finn Thain wrote:
On 6/25/21 8:53 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
Commit 3fe9a838ec "dp8393x: Always use 32-bit accesses" assumed that
all accesses to the registers were 32-bit
No, that assumption was not made there. Just take a look at my commits in
Linux that make 16-bit ac
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/25/21 8:53 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> > Commit 3fe9a838ec "dp8393x: Always use 32-bit accesses" assumed that
> > all accesses to the registers were 32-bit
No, that assumption was not made there. Just take a look at my commits in
Linux
On 6/25/21 8:53 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> Commit 3fe9a838ec "dp8393x: Always use 32-bit accesses" assumed that all
> accesses
> to the registers were 32-bit but this is actually not the case. The access
> size is
> determined by the CPU instruction used and not the number of physical address
Commit 3fe9a838ec "dp8393x: Always use 32-bit accesses" assumed that all
accesses
to the registers were 32-bit but this is actually not the case. The access size
is
determined by the CPU instruction used and not the number of physical address
lines.
The big_endian workaround applied to the regi
