On Fri Sep 1, 2023 at 10:25 PM AEST, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> Nick,
>
> On 8/8/23 06:19, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > When storing a large decrementer value with the most significant
> > implemented bit set, it is to be treated as a negative and sign
> > extended.
> >
> > This isn't hit for book3s
Nick,
On 8/8/23 06:19, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
When storing a large decrementer value with the most significant
implemented bit set, it is to be treated as a negative and sign
extended.
This isn't hit for book3s DEC because of another bug, fixing it
in the next patch exposes this one and can
When storing a large decrementer value with the most significant
implemented bit set, it is to be treated as a negative and sign
extended.
This isn't hit for book3s DEC because of another bug, fixing it
in the next patch exposes this one and can cause additional
problems, so fix this first. It
