On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 11:11 PM Tsukasa OI
wrote:
>
> Some bits in RISC-V `misa' CSR should not be reflected in the ISA
> string. For instance, `S' and `U' (represents existence of supervisor
> and user mode, respectively) in `misa' CSR must not be copied since
> neither `S' nor `U' are valid si
Le 30/03/2022 à 04:08, Tsukasa OI a écrit :
On 2022/03/30 1:29, Frédéric Pétrot wrote:
Hello,
Le 28/03/2022 à 15:11, Tsukasa OI a écrit :
Some bits in RISC-V `misa' CSR should not be reflected in the ISA
string. For instance, `S' and `U' (represents existence of supervisor
and user mode, resp
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 11:11 PM Tsukasa OI
wrote:
>
> Some bits in RISC-V `misa' CSR should not be reflected in the ISA
> string. For instance, `S' and `U' (represents existence of supervisor
> and user mode, respectively) in `misa' CSR must not be copied since
> neither `S' nor `U' are valid si
On 2022/03/30 1:29, Frédéric Pétrot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 28/03/2022 à 15:11, Tsukasa OI a écrit :
>> Some bits in RISC-V `misa' CSR should not be reflected in the ISA
>> string. For instance, `S' and `U' (represents existence of supervisor
>> and user mode, respectively) in `misa' CSR must not
Hello,
Le 28/03/2022 à 15:11, Tsukasa OI a écrit :
Some bits in RISC-V `misa' CSR should not be reflected in the ISA
string. For instance, `S' and `U' (represents existence of supervisor
and user mode, respectively) in `misa' CSR must not be copied since
neither `S' nor `U' are valid single-let
Some bits in RISC-V `misa' CSR should not be reflected in the ISA
string. For instance, `S' and `U' (represents existence of supervisor
and user mode, respectively) in `misa' CSR must not be copied since
neither `S' nor `U' are valid single-letter extensions.
This commit also removes all reserved