On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 3:50 AM Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:41 PM Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> >
> > The -1 assumes that all devices with no cvq have an spare vq allocated
> > for them, but with no offer of VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ. This is an invalid
> > device by the standard, so just s
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:41 PM Eugenio Pérez wrote:
>
> The -1 assumes that all devices with no cvq have an spare vq allocated
> for them, but with no offer of VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ. This is an invalid
> device by the standard, so just stick to the right number of device
> models.
>
> This is not a
Eugenio Pérez wrote:
Y> The -1 assumes that all devices with no cvq have an spare vq allocated
> for them, but with no offer of VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ. This is an invalid
> device by the standard, so just stick to the right number of device
> models.
>
> This is not a problem to vhost-net, but it is
The -1 assumes that all devices with no cvq have an spare vq allocated
for them, but with no offer of VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ. This is an invalid
device by the standard, so just stick to the right number of device
models.
This is not a problem to vhost-net, but it is to vhost-vdpa, which
device model
